Considering the question of whether belief in God lacks the evidence to support it - and why arguments on their own are not enough.

Are the Gospels full of contradictions? What would have been seen as normal standards of trustworthy historical writing at that time?

Were the Gospel accounts corrupted as they were passed on? Was there any way to prevent this happening?

This is a ‘wham-bam, take it or leave it’ book. Prof. Grayling issues terse, often idiosyncratic, definitions without…

Michael Ots asks three questions about suffering: 1. Why is there suffering? 2. What, if anything, has God done about it? 3. What will…

In this article, Melvin Tinker explains why he thinks that evangelicals can differ over their approach to understanding creation from…

We are living in a day in which people are pessimistic about the future. There have always been pessimists, but now there is a general…

During the Question and Answer session of Professor Craig's Manchester Lecture "Is Life without God Absurd?", he was asked how he came to…

A response to the accusation that science is the enemy of Christianity.