This video examines the historical evidence for the life of Jesus, including discussion of the non-biblical evidence.

This video considers whether we can dismiss the accounts of Jesus's life simply because they describe miracles.

The way the Gospel accounts use the right names for people shows that they were about real people, based on reliable information.

How big are the differences between the hand-written copies of the Gospels' accounts of Jesus? Do these undermine what we can know about…

Did Jesus claim or imply that he was anything more than a prophet? Or did his followers transform him into the Son of God many years later?

Are the Gospels full of contradictions? What would have been seen as normal standards of trustworthy historical writing at that time?

The way the Gospel accounts use correct place names shows that they were based on reliable information from first hand testimony.

This video describes the discovery of the earliest copy of part of John's Gospel, the 'John Rylands Fragment'.

Were the Gospel accounts corrupted as they were passed on? Was there any way to prevent this happening?