A review of Bart Ehrman's book claiming that many of the New Testament documents were falsely written under someone else's name.

Are the New Testament books an arbitrary or personal selection of what was available? Or is there more to it than that?

Some reflections on why the canonical Gospels are in the Bible whereas the apocryphal Gospels are not.

Peter May considers some of the earliest evidence for the resurrection: the early Christian creed recorded in 1 Corinthians 15:3-5

Are the Gospels full of contradictions? What would have been seen as normal standards of trustworthy historical writing at that time?

Did the early Christian communities apply Jesus's teaching to the problems they faced or alter the facts to fit their agendas?

Were the Gospel accounts based on the testimony of eyewitnesses who were still alive when the Gospels were written?

How many hand-written copies of the Gospel accounts are there? What does this reveal about possible mistakes?

Finkelstein and Mazar represent two of the most influential Israeli archaeologists of the present generation. Finkelstein is a professor at…