Are the Gospels full of contradictions? What would have been seen as normal standards of trustworthy historical writing at that time?

The way the Gospel accounts use the right names for people shows that they were about real people, based on reliable information.

The way the Gospel accounts use correct place names shows that they were based on reliable information from first hand testimony.

Can we be confident that we have the original text of the Gospels? How does it compare to other ancient documents?

A day conference on New Testament historical apologetics affirms the reliability of the New Testament using new lines of evidence.

The Jewish Bible contains over 100 promises about an exceptional person who would come to save the world. But what were the chances that…

“If Christianity is not true, then it’s not worth believing” - This book addresses common objections to Christian truth claims.

Did Jesus claim or imply that he was anything more than a prophet? Or did his followers transform him into the Son of God many years later?

Were the Gospel accounts based on the testimony of eyewitnesses who were still alive when the Gospels were written?