Are the apocryphal gospels true?
Some reflections on why the canonical Gospels are in the Bible whereas the apocryphal Gospels are not.
Related resources for Archaeology and the Historical Reliability of the New Testament
Some reflections on why the canonical Gospels are in the Bible whereas the apocryphal Gospels are not.
Do the Gospels give us any indication that they are using eyewitness testimony? Richard Bauckham examines some of the minor characters in…
The Zondervan Counterpoints series continues to produce extremely valuable volumes of the two-, three-, four-, and five-views variety on…
A day conference on New Testament historical apologetics affirms the reliability of the New Testament using new lines of evidence.
What should we make of claims that differences in the Gospel accounts mean they can't be trusted?
“If Christianity is not true, then it’s not worth believing” - This book addresses common objections to Christian truth claims.
Review of Dirk Jongkind's talk arguing that the message of the Bible is preserved, despite variations between manuscripts
In this video, Richard Bauckham considers whether we can know who were the main witnesses behind the Gospel accounts of Jesus's life.
Were the Gospel accounts based on the testimony of eyewitnesses who were still alive when the Gospels were written?