This talk explains why the claim that Jesus was no more than a moral teacher doesn't account for the evidence about him.

This video considers how long it took before Jesus's first followers came to believe that he was the Son of God.

Are the Gospels full of contradictions? What would have been seen as normal standards of trustworthy historical writing at that time?

Did the early Christian communities apply Jesus's teaching to the problems they faced or alter the facts to fit their agendas?

Were the Gospel accounts based on the testimony of eyewitnesses who were still alive when the Gospels were written?

The way the Gospel accounts use the right names for people shows that they were about real people, based on reliable information.

The way the Gospel accounts use correct place names shows that they were based on reliable information from first hand testimony.

Were the Gospel accounts corrupted as they were passed on? Was there any way to prevent this happening?

Can we be confident that we have the original text of the Gospels? How does it compare to other ancient documents?