
Real Places in the Gospels
The way the Gospel accounts use correct place names shows that they were based on reliable information from first hand testimony.
Related resources for Archaeology and the Historical Reliability of the New Testament
The way the Gospel accounts use correct place names shows that they were based on reliable information from first hand testimony.
Were the Gospel accounts corrupted as they were passed on? Was there any way to prevent this happening?
Many non-Christians see the Bible as completely unreliable. Here are some tips for addressing this challenge.
Some people claim there are 'lost books' that should have been included in the Bible. Greg Koukl says this view doesn't make sense, whether…
A review of Michael Licona's attempt to explain differences in the Gospel narratives by looking at the work of Plutarch.
Three questions to ask your history teacher when they claim you can't trust the Gospels.
Sean McDowell interviews Mike Licona on how his research into ancient biographies sheds light onto Gospel contradictions.
A review of Bart Ehrman's book claiming that many of the New Testament documents were falsely written under someone else's name.
Some reflections on why the canonical Gospels are in the Bible whereas the apocryphal Gospels are not.