
Bible and Church Conference: the reliability of the NT
A day conference on New Testament historical apologetics affirms the reliability of the New Testament using new lines of evidence.
Related resources for Don't the resurrection accounts contradict each other?
A day conference on New Testament historical apologetics affirms the reliability of the New Testament using new lines of evidence.
How should we address apparent contradictions in the Bible? This article tackles some specific examples.
The first disciples claimed that Jesus had risen from the dead. But is it possible that such stories are a deliberate deception?
Was Jesus' tomb really empty, or was this just a story made up years later?
Some reflections on why the canonical Gospels are in the Bible whereas the apocryphal Gospels are not.
Considering the question of whether belief in God lacks the evidence to support it - and why arguments on their own are not enough.
Can we know who wrote the Gospels? This video examines whether there is any evidence to support the traditional authors.
The way the Gospel accounts use correct place names shows that they were based on reliable information from first hand testimony.
How big are the differences between the hand-written copies of the Gospels' accounts of Jesus? Do these undermine what we can know about…