Archaeology and the Historical Reliability of the New Testament
Peter S. Williams examines the historical reliability of the New Testament in the light of the findings of archaeology. “On the…
Peter S. Williams (MA, MPhil) is Assistant Professor in Communication and Worldviews at Gimlekollen School of Journalism and Communication, NLA University College, Norway. He is author of many articles and books, including A Faithful Guide to Philosophy (Wipf and Stock, 2019), Getting at Jesus: A Comprehensive Critique of Neo-Atheist Nonsense about the Jesus of History (Wipf and Stock, 2019) and C.S.Lewis vs the New Atheists (Paternoster, 2013). His website is www.peterswilliams.com.
Peter S. Williams examines the historical reliability of the New Testament in the light of the findings of archaeology. “On the…
A Universe From Nothing: Why There Is Something Rather Than Nothing (Free Press, 2012), by cosmologist Lawrence M. Krauss, has been lauded…
The ongoing scientific quest to explore space – 'the final frontier' – is intimately bound up with the search for 'strange new…
Philosopher Peter S. Williams reviews the Christian, Hindu and Secular Humanist perspectives on themes of Truth, Faith and Hope in the…
Professor Antony Flew, 81 years old, is: “a legendary British philosopher and atheist and has been an icon and champion for…
God Questions is a record of debate arising out of a correspondence between American Atheist Professor Carl Stecher and English Philosopher…
Apologetics is often seen as an 'intellectual' activity, remote from everyday life. Peter S. Williams proposes a more holistic view.
Atheists and Muslims often criticise the Christian concept of the Trinity as contradictory, meaningless or false. In this article, Peter S.…
William Lane Craig and Peter S.Williams debate with Arif Ahmed and Andrew Copson at the Cambridge Union Society.
A.C. Grayling, Professor of Philosophy at Birkbeck College, University of London, begins his self-described ‘polemic’ against…
This extended review provides some excellent responses to arguments that Sagan used and which keep cropping up today.
A.C. Grayling discusses the arguments in his book The God Argument with Peter S. Williams on Justin Brierley's 'Unbelievable?' radio…
This is Part 1 of Peter S. Williams' article 'Intelligent Designs on Science', which is the final paper in a series of interactions between…
A response to the 'Who Made God?' objection to the Cosmological Argument.
Peter S. Williams responds to Denis Alexander on the issue of the Christian and biblical understanding of evolution and intelligent design.
In the twenty-first century, can people really still believe in angels and demons?
In this article, Peter S. Williams defends one of the key statements of Intelligent Design theory, namely that specified complexity…
The most discussed moral argument for God’s existence is currently the argument concerning the ontological basis for objective moral…
Neo-atheist Sam Harris alleges that the faith of Christian geneticist Francis Collins is unscientific: James Watson, the co-discoverer…
At the start of 2005, online magazine ‘Edge The World Question Centre’ posed the following question to a number of scientific…
I woke up this morning to a radio news item about the continuing scandal of child abuse carried out by some Catholic priests during the…
Scientism says that science is the source of all our knowledge. Does this make sense or are there other sources for what we can know?
Peter S. Williams chairs a discussion with William Lane Craig, John Lennox, Peter J. Williams and Gary R. Habermas.
Cell biologist Lewis Wolpert has recently attained a measure of notoriety with the British public, primarily through the publication of his…
Zoologist Dr. Richard Dawkins (1941-) is ‘materialistic, reductionist and overtly anti-religious.’[1] Charles Simonyi, head of…
Peter S. Williams offers his thoughts on philosopher A.C. Grayling's The Good Book: A Secular Bible. Note that Grayling lays his book out…
Review of Amazing Grace in the light of whether religion is a force for good or for bad.