Challenging the New Atheist view of Old Testament Ethics
This talk challenges the New Atheist interpretations and condemnation of the Old Testament, including the destruction of the Canaanites.
This talk challenges the New Atheist interpretations and condemnation of the Old Testament, including the destruction of the Canaanites.
Some New Atheists argue that belief in God is as sensible as belief in a Flying Spaghetti Monster. Greg explains why this is not the case.
What does the oldest fragment of the New Testament tell us?
Is the Bible just a book written by men, for men, reflecting the prejudices of a different time?
It's often claimed that Jesus' followers borrowed existing pagan beliefs about resurrection. Is that true?
Was Jesus' tomb really empty, or was this just a story made up years later?
Are the New Testament books an arbitrary or personal selection of what was available? Or is there more to it than that?
Considering the question of whether belief in God lacks the evidence to support it - and why arguments on their own are not enough.
Are the Gospels full of contradictions? What would have been seen as normal standards of trustworthy historical writing at that time?