Did Jesus claim or imply that he was anything more than a prophet? Or did his followers transform him into the Son of God many years later?

Are the Gospels full of contradictions? What would have been seen as normal standards of trustworthy historical writing at that time?

How big are the differences between the hand-written copies of the Gospels' accounts of Jesus? Do these undermine what we can know about…

The way the Gospel accounts use correct place names shows that they were based on reliable information from first hand testimony.

This video considers how long it took before Jesus's first followers came to believe that he was the Son of God.