Are the apocryphal gospels true?
Some reflections on why the canonical Gospels are in the Bible whereas the apocryphal Gospels are not.
Related resources for Archaeology and the Historical Reliability of the New Testament
Some reflections on why the canonical Gospels are in the Bible whereas the apocryphal Gospels are not.
This video considers how long it took before Jesus's first followers came to believe that he was the Son of God.
Read this book if you want to be prepared to speak to anyone interested in why they can trust the accounts they read in the Gospels. And…
Professor Alan Millard critiques the BBC series The Bible's Buried Secrets. Dr Francesca Stavrakopoulou presented three BBC TV programmes…
One of the most popular theories in New Testament study is that the Gospel of Mark was written first, and that both Matthew and Luke were…
Some people claim there are 'lost books' that should have been included in the Bible. Greg Koukl says this view doesn't make sense, whether…
A review of Michael Licona's attempt to explain differences in the Gospel narratives by looking at the work of Plutarch.
Examine the role played by Christianity in the Magna Carta.
For the first time, Western Orientalists (primarily in Europe) are applying an external historical / critical analysis of the Qur’an,…