Did Jesus claim or imply that he was anything more than a prophet? Or did his followers transform him into the Son of God many years later?

Did the early Christian communities apply Jesus's teaching to the problems they faced or alter the facts to fit their agendas?

The way the Gospel accounts use correct place names shows that they were based on reliable information from first hand testimony.

Were the Gospel accounts corrupted as they were passed on? Was there any way to prevent this happening?

This video considers whether we can dismiss the accounts of Jesus's life simply because they describe miracles.

Why philosopher A.C. Grayling refuses to debate William Lane Craig.

What does the oldest fragment of the New Testament tell us?

Why a rabbi who considered the New Testament to be anti-Semitic changed his mind. Rabbi Isaac Lichtenstein was curious when he observed…

You may have seen the recent programme "The Beauty of Books: Ancient Bibles" on BBC4, 8th February 2011. This well-produced and researched…