Oxford professors John Lennox and Peter Atkins discuss whether we can answer all life's questions using the scientific method.

Are claims that Jesus rose from the dead simply legends that were made up hundreds of years after he died?

Is it possible that the accounts of the resurrection are simply the result of hallucinations brought on by grief?

What should we make of claims that differences in the Gospel accounts mean they can't be trusted?

Part 2 of a video series examining why God allows suffering suggests possible answers that can be offered.

Peter Byrom explains how apologetics enabled him to see that Christian belief was reasonable and needed a response.

Considering the question of whether belief in God lacks the evidence to support it - and why arguments on their own are not enough.

Did Jesus claim or imply that he was anything more than a prophet? Or did his followers transform him into the Son of God many years later?

Are the Gospels full of contradictions? What would have been seen as normal standards of trustworthy historical writing at that time?